Critical Studies on the Quranic Exegesis

Critical Studies on the Quranic Exegesis

Reading the Quranic Story of Mary: Lintvelt's Narratology in Dialogue with Ṭabāṭabāʾī's Al-Mīzān

Document Type : Original article

Authors
1 Professor of Arabic Language and Literature, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran.
2 Master's Degree in Arabic Language and Literature, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran
3 Assistance Professor of English Language and Literature, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran.
10.22034/naghdeara.2025.531736.1317
Abstract
This study presents a narrative analysis of the story of Maryam (Mary) in the Qurʾān, employing the theoretical framework of Jaap Lintvelt's narratology and engaging with the exegetical insights of Sayyid Muḥammad Ḥusayn Ṭabāṭabāʾī from his seminal work, Al-Mīzān. The primary objective is to elucidate the narrative structure of Maryam's story, delineate the types of narrative modes utilized, and demonstrate how such a narratological analysis can reinforce and complement traditional interpretive hypotheses, as exemplified in Ṭabāṭabāʾī's commentary. The research adopts a descriptive-analytical methodology, treating the Quran as a cohesive macro-narrative despite the story's dispersion across different chapters, primarily Surah Āl ʿImrān and Surah Maryam.
The analysis reveals that the dominant narrative mode in the Quranic account of Maryam is heterodiegetic, featuring an omniscient narrator who exists outside the story's world of characters and events. This narrator, positioned in a transcendent realm, possesses comprehensive knowledge of both external actions and internal states of the characters. However, the narrative is not monolithic; it exhibits a dynamic and integrated approach. The narrator fluidly shifts the focalization between what Lintvelt terms the "auctorial narrative type," where the reader's focus is guided by the narrator's overarching perspective, and the "actorial narrative type," where the center of orientation temporarily rests upon a specific character, primarily Maryam herself. This is particularly evident in dialogue-heavy scenes, such as the annunciation to Maryam and the infant Jesus speaking from the cradle, allowing readers to experience events through the characters' perspectives while maintaining the narrator's ultimate authority.
A central feature of the narrative is the dialectical relationship between the omniscient narrator and the story's actants. The narrator actively guides the reception of the narrative, managing the reader's focus and conveying intended meanings, while characters like Maryam are portrayed as dynamic and influential agents whose actions and choices are crucial to the plot's progression. This interaction underscores a synthesis between human agency and divine guidance. The narrative pattern follows a complete structural model, moving from an initial equilibrium to its disruption by a destructive force, followed by a phase of conflict and struggle, and ultimately resolved by an organizing, divine force that restores a new, elevated equilibrium. Key climaxes include Maryam's virginal conception and the miraculous speech of Jesus in his cradle, which serve to resolve critical conflicts and affirm divine power.
Despite the story's distribution across multiple surahs, the study argues for its inherent narrative coherence. When the scattered segments are assembled, they form a linear, causally connected macro-structure. The singular, omniscient narrator is the key agent in creating this cohesion, orchestrating the various episodes into a unified whole with a clear beginning, middle, and end, all serving the Quran's overarching theological and didactic objectives.
The analysis of specific narrative elements—such as time, dialogue, point of view, characterization, and dramatic conflict—further enriches the understanding of the story. The strategic use of time, including analepsis (flashback) and variations in narrative pace, along with shifting points of view during key dialogues and internal monologues, deepens the dramatic impact and character portrayal. Maryam is characterized through her actions, reactions, and struggles—both internal and external—as a model of faith, purity, and steadfastness.
Crucially, the findings of this narratological investigation are placed in dialogue with the exegetical positions of Ṭabāṭabāʾī in Al-Mīzān. The study demonstrates a significant convergence between the two approaches. For instance, the narratological identification of the guiding, external omniscient narrator aligns with Ṭabāṭabāʾī's emphasis on God's preemptive knowledge and overseeing role in the narrative. The analysis of the plot's pattern, identifying disruptive forces and divine resolutions, corroborates his interpretations concerning God's management of crises and support for righteous believers. Furthermore, the narrative's portrayal of Maryam's character, emphasizing her piety and God-given status (iṣṭifāʾ), reinforces Ṭabāṭabāʾī's theological argument for her ʿiṣmah (infallibility/protection from sin).
It is important to note that the author's analysis proceeds from within the framework of Islamic theology, accepting its foundational tenets regarding the nature of the Quranic text and divine intervention. The study concludes that Lintvelt's narratological theory provides a robust and effective analytical tool for examining the sophisticated narrative structures of the Quran. When applied to the story of Maryam, it not only reveals its artistic coherence but also acts as a complementary methodology to traditional exegesis, validating and deepening interpretive insights found in works like Al-Mīzān. This interdisciplinary interaction enriches the contemporary understanding of the Quranic narrative, making its ethical and spiritual messages more accessible while highlighting the text's enduring literary power.
Keywords

Subjects


             The Holy Qurʾān.
             Abū al-Futūḥ al-Rāzī, Ḥusayn b. ʿAlī, Rawḍ al-Janān, ed. Abū al-Ḥasan Shaʿrānī, Tehran, Kitābfurūshī-ye Eslāmī, 1398 AH [Persian].
             Okhovvat, Aḥmad, Dastūr-e Zabān-e Dāstān, Isfahan, Enteshārāt-e Fardā, 1371 SAH [Persian].
             Aqāreb-Parast, Fāṭemeh-Saʿīdeh, and Moṭīʿ, Mahdī, “A Narratological Analysis of Prophet Yusuf's Story Using Jaap Lintvelt's Theory”, Literary-Qurʾānic Research, no. 23, vol. 6, no. 3, 2018, pp. 1-24 [Persian][1].
             Aqāreb-Parast, Fāṭemeh-Saʿīdeh, and Moṭīʿ, Mahdī, “An Analysis of the Prophet Moses’ Story based on Jaap Lintvelt's Theory”, Qurʾān and Hadith Studies, vol. 51, no. 1, 2018, pp. 1-20 [Persian][2].
             Bal, Mieke, Narratology: Introduction to the Theory of Narrative, tr. ʿAlī ʿAbbāsī and Nuṣrat Ḥijāzī, Tehran, Scientific and Cultural Publications Company, 1390 SAH [Persian].
             Eagleton, Terry, An Introduction to Literary Theory, tr. ʿAbbās Mukhbir, Tehran, Markaz, 1380 SAH [Persian].
             Ḥoseynī, Aʿzam al-Sādāt, Moṭīʿ, Mahdī, and Loṭfī, Mahdī, “The Narrative Analysis of the Holy Mary’s Story in the Holy Quran”, Researches of Quran and Hadith Sciences, no. 39, vol. 15, no. 3, 2018, pp. 1-24 [Persian][3].
             Khosrawī, Abū Torāb, Ḥāshīye-ʾī bar Mabānī-ye Dāstān, Tehran, Thāleth, 1388 SAH [Persian].
10ـ         Modabberī, Maḥmūd, and Ḥoseynī Sorūrī, Najmeh, “From Historical Narrative to Fictional Narrative: A Comparison of Narrative Methods in Ferdowsi’s and Nezami’s Eskandar-nameh”, Persian Language and Literature Research Journal, no. 6, vol. 2, no. 2, 2008, pp. 1-20 [Persian].
11ـ         Makaryk, Irene Rima, Encyclopedia of Contemporary Literary Theory, tr. Mehrān Mohājer and Moḥammad Nabavī, Tehran, Nashr-e Āgah, 1383 SAH [Persian].
12ـ         Mīrṣādeqī, Jamāl, Zāwiye-ye Dīd dar Dāstān, Tehran, Enteshārāt-e Sukhan, 1391 SAH [Persian].
13ـ         Morādī, Zohreh, “The Studying of Structural and Typology of Narrative in the Story of Prophet Muhammad (p.b.u.h.) in Literature and Painting by Jaap Lintvelt Theory”, Journal of Fine Arts: Visual Arts, vol. 25, no. 1, 2020, pp. 15-26 [Persian][4].
14ـ         Moḥammadī, Moḥammad Hādī, and ʿAbbāsī, ʿAlī, Ṣad Sākhtār-e Yek Ostūreh, Tehran, Nashr-e Chīstā, 1381 SAH [Persian].
15ـ         Moḥammadī, Moḥammad Hādī, Ravesh-Shenāsī-ye Naqd-e Adabīyāt-e Kūdak, Tehran, Enteshārāt-e Soroush, 1378 SAH [Persian].
16ـ         Mandanī-Pūr, Shahriyār, Kitāb-e Arwāḥ-e Shahrzād, Tehran, Nashr-e Quqnūs, 1384 SAH [Persian].
17ـ         Ṣāleḥī, Paymān, and Bāqerī, Kolthūm, “The Unreliable Narrator in the Novels Kawābīs Bairūt and Shāzdeh Eḥtejāb”, Comparative Literature Research, vol. 9, no. 3, 2021, pp. 112-144 [Persian][5].
18ـ         Ṭabāṭabāʾī, Muḥammad Ḥusayn, Al-Mīzān, Qom, Jāmāʿah al-Mudarrisīn, 1412 AH [Persian].
Toolan, Michael J., Narrative: A Critical Linguistic Introduction, tr. Sayyed Fāṭemeh ʿAlawī and Fāṭemeh Neʿmatī, Tehran, SAMT, 1386 SAH [Persian].
Volume 6, Issue 1 - Serial Number 11
September 2025
Pages 295-318

  • Receive Date 08 July 2025
  • Revise Date 20 September 2025
  • Accept Date 20 September 2025