|
Dear authors are requested to review all the following items carefully before submitting the article and especially to prepare their article according to the mentioned criteria for typesetting and pagination mentioned in paragraph T of the following article. Writing guidelines and article acceptance criteriaThe bi-annual research journal publishes interpretative reviews of scientific research, promotional and review articles. Determining which of the mentioned three qualities the article has is done with the judges and editorial members of the magazine, based on written rules (click here to see the criteria and definitions that are the basis of this judgment). The biannual research journal Naqd Ara Tafsir is responsible for publishing those studies in the field of Qur'an and Hadith studies, in which the theoretical productions of thinkers, intellectual currents and schools of the Islamic world are recognized or evaluated in the field of understanding the Holy Qur'an; Whether these theoretical productions follow the understanding of the macrostructure of the Quranic teachings, or whether they are simply an attempt to reproduce the understanding of the words and combinations, verses and different surahs. Therefore, any article that presents, develops, or localizes research in the following fields will be recognized in accordance with the journal's mission: 1) Recognition and criticism of Muslim commentators in the field of various sciences and knowledge - including religious knowledge. (such as jurisprudence, theology...) and customary (such as psychology, linguistics, sociology, geography...) - based on new approaches and methods of rereading and criticizing opinions in different sciences; 2) Application of Quranic studies by creating the interaction of the views of ancient Muslim thinkers with different sciences. A) Thematic axes of publishing articlesIn order to fulfill the above mission, the editorial board of the research journal Naqd Ara Tafseer welcomes the publication of articles with the following themes: The first axis: Recognizing the understanding of different interpreters of the Qur'an, such as trying to recognize the interpretive opinions of religious elders and scholars, validating the attribution of interpretive opinions and the issue of identity and attribution of exegetical books, or recognizing and criticizing the interpretive opinions of Muslim and possibly non-Muslim scholars. The second axis: Recognizing the origin of the opinions of commentators and the factors influencing their formation, such as recognizing the theological, mystical, philosophical, jurisprudential, principled and Quranic bases of the commentators, rereading the interpretation theory of religious elders and Muslim scholars, discussing the influence of the foundations, sources and approaches of commentators on understanding He is from the Holy Qur'an, and the typology and genealogy of understandings from the Qur'an, the evolution of interpretations over time and its social contexts. The third axis: Recognizing the reflections of Muslim commentators on various issues of existence and human life, as well as an effort to recognise the theological, ethical, philosophical, social, and psychological thoughts of the commentators, recognizing the naturalistic insights of the commentators, including astronomical, geographical, biological, medical and similar theories. Linguistic analyzes in the interpretations of the Holy Quran, or aesthetic theorizing in the position of understanding the Quran. The fourth axis: Understanding the Qur'an in the light of new scientific theories and achievements, for example, trying to criticize or adjust the opinions of commentators in the light of new scientific theories, re-understanding the sources of interpretation of the Holy Qur'an by taking advantage of scientific approaches and methods or new theological opinions, or discussing the principles and foundations Application of modern sciences in understanding the Quran. b) Form criteriaThe acceptance of the article in the review research journal requires following the following criteria: 1) The article should be written in the Microsoft Word software environment, and should be sent only through the journal system without mentioning the names of the authors. 2) The details of the authors should be sent in a separate file and entered exactly in the system according to the mentioned standard. It is mandatory to include all of these items: name and surname, academic rank, field of study, name of the university or institution of employment, position and type of employment, and the e-mail address of each author, along with the telephone number and mailing address of the responsible writer. 3) The article will contain the title, abstract, keywords, income, problem statement, body of the article, conclusion, and references. The abstract contains a brief explanation of about 225-150 words about the topic of discussion, the issue of discussion, approach, method, assumptions and possible results. The income consists of an intensive explanation of the discussion field, the theoretical necessities of the study in it, the position of the topic of this article in that field and the fundamental concepts of the discussion. The problem statement is a condensed and categorized overview of what has been said so far about the topic of discussion, the problems of those views and the remaining ambiguities, questions among those ambiguities that are supposed to be answered in this study, and the steps that should be followed for this purpose in the following sections. body of the article) to follow. The body of the article contains three or four parts with balanced volumes, each of which contains three or four chapters with balanced volumes. The result of the article does not necessarily mean a review and summary of the article and it specifies the achievements of the study. It is necessary to translate the title, abstract, keywords, and sources into English, and send them in a separate file format in the system. c) Referral methodCitations are followed based on localization of the MLA documentation method. The insertion of these references is also in the textual manner and is placed immediately after quoting the material and between parentheses, and the name of the author's city, the name of the work, the cover and the desired page are expressed according to this pattern: (Tabatabai, Al-Mizan, 35/1). Whenever multiple references are given in a row, the different sources are listed in the text of the article according to the year of their creation or the year of the death of their authors, and separated by semicolons. For example, we write inside the reference parenthesis: (Ibn Hajar Asqlani, Al-Asaba, 4/126; Tabatabaei, Al-Mizan, 1/35). Also, sources that are in Latin languages and other languages, the name of the author and the work inside the Persian text are transliterated, and if the author or the work is unknown to the Persian-speaking readers of the magazine. In other words, the title of the author or the work or both appears in the footnote, and the cover and page numbers are written in Roman letters and Latin numbers respectively; For example, we write in the text: (Nöldeke, History of the Qur'an, II/154) and then insert the footnote number in front of the translation of the name of the work, and in the footnote we also add: "Nöldeke, Geschichte des Qorâns"; Or if we want to refer to a Latin article in the text, for example: (Shacht, "Malik b. Anas". Even if the name of the author and the work are not written in Latin, the reader knows from the Latin numbers that he sees in the Persian text that he should look for the details of the work in Latin sources. Latin and similar sources are included after Persian and Arabic sources. References in the final sources of the article are as follows: author details (author's town name, author's name), work details (book name in bold and italic letters or article name in quotation marks, comma, name of the book or journal containing that article in bold and italic letters) , the details of the translator or proofreader of the work (exactly with this template: Ahmad Aram's translation, or Ali Akbar Ghafari's effort), and at the end, the publication details (place of publication, publisher, year of publication, or serial number and edition of the magazine). Also, references are listed in alphabetical order. For example: - Hosseini, Mohammad Reza, "The topic of bodies and bodies", Trathana, 10th year, number 19, spring 1410 AH. - Siyuti, Abdurrahman bin Abi Bakr, Bughiyyah al-Wooat, with the efforts of Muhammad Abolfazl Ibrahim, Beirut/Sida, Al-Maktaba al-Asriya, 1964. The names of authors and books should be recognized based on the way the author is mentioned in most of the works or by referring to books and encyclopedias, and the title on the back cover of the work is not necessarily correct. For example, the name of Ashhar Muhammad Hassan Najafi is "Saheb Jawahar", or although the author of the book of al-Faqih Man La Yahzorah al-Faqih is also known as "Sheikh Saduq" in the later centuries, his name of Ashhar and the recording of works such as the great Islamic encyclopedia "Ibn Babwiyeh", and the name of Ashhar The book itself is also mine. If an author was known by several names, we choose the name that is more consistent with scientific impartiality. A number of acceptable names can be found in the style sheet of the magazine appendix (available on the front page of the magazine's website). t) Acceptance and publishing policiesThe article must be the result of the authors' own studies and has not been published before in any domestic or foreign journal, and it must not have been sent to another journal for evaluation at the same time. Also, the authors must certify when submitting the article that there is no conflict of interest in the publication of the article and no natural or legal person will claim the benefits of that article. It is necessary for the authors to certify the above by writing the letters of commitment according to the template available on the journal's website and sending the image of the forms signed by all the authors. The evaluation process is such that the editor of the journal evaluates the article within two working days after submission, first in terms of the degree of conformity with the mission of the journal and the degree of conformity with the format criteria of the journal, and raises any problems in these fields with the author. Whenever the article is consistent with the mission and format criteria of the journal, the editor sends it to the referee. It is necessary that at least two referees confirm the scientific validity of the article and the author obtains at least half of the article's publication points from the total number of referees. Whenever the article gets the necessary points in the judging, it will be discussed in the meeting of the editorial board members. The acceptance of the article is subject to the approval of the editorial board. After the approval of the editorial board, the article is accepted, and the result is announced to the authors; But its publication depends on the confirmation of the originality and scientific validity of the article by the scientific editor. Submitting an article to an interpretative review journal requires accepting the role of editors in improving the quality of the article. In any case, the final publication of the article will be possible only with the approval of the final version by the author and editor. Accepted articles will be uploaded to the journal system and their title, abstract and keywords will be available before the final publication. Various stages of workflow and acceptance of articles are displayed on the journal's website with a flow diagram. c) Typesetting, pagination, and calligraphy guideBefore submitting the article, all dear authors are requested to carefully receive the typesetting and pagination guide of the magazine and adjust their article exactly according to it. In addition to the detailed explanation of the criteria, there are many additional explanations in this manual, which can be followed to get a higher score in the judging, and to speed up the process of editing and publishing the article.
D) Article Formatting and StructureAccording to the approval of the journal's editorial board, upon submission of the article to the journal and after confirming that its subject is in line with the journal's mission, authors are asked to format their article in accordance with the journal's structure. After the authors have structured the article and the formal compliance of the article with the journal's editorial guidelines has been approved by the editor or his/her successor, the article will be sent for review. Sometimes, the article may be returned to the author for further revision, or may be rejected altogether if the revisions are insufficient or the time is running out. To be aware of the appearance and structure of the articles in the Critique of Interpretive Opinions research paper, authors need to download these files:
Download the magazine's editing guide and typesetting, pagination, and script
In addition, it is suggested that they read a few examples of the journal articles carefully and draw inspiration from the common features of the articles. Authors are required to observe each of the above items, and if the article is not prepared in accordance with the aforementioned rules and regulations, the article will not be sent for review. |