Critical Studies on the Quranic Exegesis

Critical Studies on the Quranic Exegesis

Context as an Interpretive Method: A Study of Sabzawārī's Mawāhib al-Raḥmān

Document Type : Original article

Authors
1 PhD student in Qurʾān and Hadith Sciences, Department of Islamic Theology, Go. C., Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Theology and Islamic Studies, Go. C., Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran.
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Persian Language and Literature, Go. C., Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran.
4 Assistant Professor, Department of Islamic Theology, Go. C., Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran.
10.22034/naghdeara.2025.537252.1329
Abstract
Interpreters of the Qurʾān have traditionally recognized siyāq (context) as a fundamental hermeneutical tool, generally defined as the ensemble of intra-textual indicators surrounding a verse that are essential for its correct exegesis. While its importance is widely acknowledged, a segment of classical and modern exegetes has expressed reservations, cautioning against a rigid, exclusive application of siyāq to all verses, which they argue can lead to artificial interpretations or impose unwarranted constraints on meaning.
This study provides a critical examination of the distinctive context-oriented methodology employed by the contemporary Shīʿī scholar, Sayyid ʿAbd al-Aʿlā Mūsawī Sabzawārī, in his voluminous exegesis, Mawāhib al-Raḥmān. It argues that Sabzawārī not only champions siyāq as a central interpretive principle but also radically expands its conventional scope, transforming it from a primarily linguistic aid into the foundational pillar of his entire exegetical system.
This study delineates a dual approach in Sabzawārī's work. On one hand, he aligns with mainstream exegetical tradition by treating siyāq as a dynamic and constructive mechanism for discerning divine intent. He leverages it to reveal the conceptual and objective coherence (munāsabah) between words, verses, and the overarching objectives of revelation. On the other hand, and this constitutes his primary innovation, Sabzawārī departs from the majority by advocating for a significantly broader conception of siyāq. For him, it is not confined to the immediate verbal environment but encompasses all textual and extra-textual indicators that can illuminate a verse's meaning. This inclusive definition integrates cultural, social, political, and historical evidence pertaining to the circumstances of revelation (asbāb al-nuzūl) as integral components of siyāq. This methodological expansion is consciously deployed to overcome the limitations and potential artificiality he identifies in narrower, purely linguistic applications of context.
Operating within the framework of Islamic, and more specifically, Shīʿī theological and hermeneutical principles, Sabzawārī's application of siyāq is both meticulous and systematic. The study meticulously catalogues the diverse functions of siyāq in Mawāhib al-Raḥmān, which can be categorized across two primary levels of operation. At the micro-analytical level (sentence and phrase), siyāq is employed to: determine the precise semantic value of words; differentiate between near-synonyms, expand or restrict lexical meanings based on the surrounding discourse, identify the correct referents of pronouns, elucidate subtle rhetorical devices such as emphasis (taʾkīd) and specificity (ḥaṣr), and ultimately, ascertain the primary intended meaning of a verse. This granular application serves to prevent misinterpretation and provides Sabzawārī with a robust, text-based criterion for critically evaluating and often refuting the opinions of other exegetes.
At the macro-analytical level (text and sūra), siyāq evolves into a powerful tool for establishing the Qurʾān's structural and thematic coherence. Sabzawārī utilizes it to: reconstruct profound semantic links between seemingly disconnected verses, resolve apparent contradictions between different Quranic passages, explain complex pronominal references across verses, analyze the rhetorical architecture of larger passages, and demonstrate the intricate thematic unity within and across sūras. This higher-order application allows him to present a holistic, problem-oriented, and systematic interpretive model that treats the Qurʾān as an integrated whole.
In conclusion, the findings of this study demonstrate that Mawāhib al-Raḥmān offers a paradigm for the systematic and hierarchical application of siyāq. Sabzawārī’s methodology successfully integrates lexical analysis, semantic coherence, rhetorical examination, and intertextual reading into a unified exegetical framework. His work, therefore, represents a significant advancement in Quranic hermeneutics, effectively elevating siyāq from its conventional status as a supplementary literary clue to that of a central, indispensable, and sophisticated methodological principle. As such, Mawāhib al-Raḥmān stands as a pioneering work in intra-textual and intertextual analysis, providing a valuable and stimulating model for future research in Quranic interpretive methodology and critical exegetical studies.
Keywords

Subjects


  • The Holy Qurʾān.
  • Ālūsī, Maḥmūd b. ʿAbd Allāh, Rūḥ al-Maʿānī fī Tafsīr al-Qurʾān al-ʿAẓīm wa al-Sabʿ al-athānī, Beirut, Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmīyah, 1415 AH [Arabic].
  • Asgharpour, H., & et. al., “Typology of the Role of Siāq in the Interpretation of Min Wahy al-Qurʾān, From Meaning Determination to Transcendence of Signification”, Quranic Stylistic Studies, vol. 12, 2023 [Persian][1].
  • Darwazah, Muḥammad ʿIzzat, Al-Tafsīr al-Ḥadīth, Cairo, Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Kutub al-ʿArabīyyah, 1383 SAH [Arabic].
  • Johnson, R., “The Role of Context in Quranic Interpretation”, Journal of Quranic Studies, vol. 17, no. 3, 2015, pp. 45-67.
  • Khāmeh-Gar, Muḥammad, Sākhtār-e Handesī-ye Sūreh-hā-ye Qurʾān, Tehran, Sherkat-e Chāp va Nashr-e Beyn al-Melalī, 1386 SAH [Persian].
  • Khaṭīb al-Qazwīnī, Muḥammad b. ʿAbd al-Raḥmān, ʿUlūm al-Balāghah, Beirut, Dār Iḥyāʾ al-ʿUlūm, 1408 AH [Arabic].
  • Maʿrifat, Muḥammad Hādī, Al-Tamhīd fī ʿUlūm al-Qurʾān, Qom, Muʾassiseh-ye Farhangī-ye Intishārātī al-Tamhīd, 1388 SAH [Arabic].
  • Muẓaffar, Muḥammad Riḍā, Uṣūl al-Fiqh, Qom, Intishārāt-e Ismāʿīlīyān, 1375 SAH [Arabic].
  • Mughnīyah, Muḥammad Jawād, Al-Tafsīr al-Kāshif, Qom, Dār al-Kitāb al-Islāmī, 1424 AH [Arabic].
  • Nouraldeen, A. S., “Meaning and Context: Three Different Perspectives”, British Journal of English Linguistics, vol. 3, no. 2, 2015, pp. 12-25.
  • Rahman, F., Major Themes of the Qurʾān, Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press, 1980.
  • Rajabī, Maḥmūd, Ravesh-e Tafsīr-e Qurʾān, Qom, Muʾassese-ye Āmūzeshī va Pajūheshī-ye Emām Khomeinī, 1388 SAH [Persian].
  • Rajabī, Maḥmūd, Ravesh-shināsī-ye Tafsīr-e Qurʾān, Qom, Pajūhishkadeh-ye Ḥawzeh va Dānishgāh va SAMT, 1379 SAH [Persian].
  • Riḍāʾī Iṣfahānī, Muḥammad ʿAlī, Tafsīr-e Qurʾān-e Mehr, Qom, Pajūhesh-hā-ye Tafsīr va ʿUlūm-e Qurʾān, 1387 SAH [Persian].
  • Sabzawārī, Sayyid ʿAbd al-Aʿlā, Mawāhib al-Raḥmān fī Tafsīr al-Qurʾān, Beirut, Muʾassasah Ahl al-Bayt, 1409 AH [Arabic].
  • Ṣadr, Sayyid Muḥammad Bāqir, Durūs fī ʿIlm al-Uṣūl, Beirut, Dār al-Kitāb al-Lubnānī, 1978 [Arabic].
  • Saeed, A., Reading the Qurʾan in the Twenty-First Century: A Contextualist Approach, Abingdon, UK, Routledge, 2014.
  • Smith, J., “Contextualizing the Qurʾān: A New Approach to Interpretation”, Islamic Studies, vol. 52, no. 3, 2015, pp. 321-340.
  • Taban, J., “The Role of Context in Interpreting Qurʾān”, Religious Anthropology, vol. 15, 2008, pp. 78-92.
  • Ṭabāṭabāʾī, Sayyid Muḥammad Ḥusayn, Al-Mīzān fī Tafsīr al-Qurʾān, Beirut, Aʿlamī, 1390 SAH [Arabic].

Zarkashī, Muḥammad b. ʿAbd Allāh, Al-Burhān fī ʿUlūm al-Qurʾān, Beirut, Dār al-Maʿrifah, 1410 AH [Arabic].

 

[1]. https://doi.org/10.30473/qss.2023.67890.1234.

Volume 6, Issue 1 - Serial Number 11
September 2025
Pages 199-220

  • Receive Date 27 July 2025
  • Revise Date 05 September 2025
  • Accept Date 06 September 2025