Critical Studies on the Quranic Exegesis

Critical Studies on the Quranic Exegesis

The Descent of Jesus or His Person? A Critical Inquiry into the Exegesis of Qurʾān 43:61 (innahū la-ʿilmun li-al-Sāʿa)

Document Type : Original article

Author
Assistant Professor, Department of Quran and Hadith Sciences, Shahid Motahari Faculty of Theology and Islamic Studies, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.
10.22034/naghdeara.2025.527238.1308
Abstract
Focusing on the verse “innahū la-ʿilmun li-al-Sāʿa” (Indeed, he is a knowledge of the eschaton; Qurʾān 43:61), this study undertakes a critical examination of its interpretations by Quranic exegetes, with the specific aim of challenging the dominant one. The verse has been a subject of extensive scholarly dispute, primarily regarding the referent of the pronoun “he/it” (hu in the word innahū) and the meaning of the term knowledge (ʿilm).
The most prevalent view among both Sunni and Shiʿa commentators identifies the referent as the descent of Jesus before the Day of Resurrection, considering it a major eschatological sign. This study posits that this popular interpretation faces significant challenges according to Islamic Theology and may not represent the most accurate understanding of the verse.
The analysis begins by exploring preliminary matters, including variant readings of the word ʿilm—such as ʿalam (meaning a sign)—and the semantic fields of the key terms ʿilm (knowledge) and al-sāʿa (the Hour, meaning Eschaton). The study then systematically reviews the dominant opinion, tracing its roots and widespread acceptance across major classical and modern Sunni and Shiʿa exegeses. It demonstrates how this view became entrenched through the influence of specific eschatological narratives (ahādīth al-Malāḥim wa al-Fitan) prevalent in Islamic tradition, which describe Jesus's descent to combat the Antichrist (al-Masīḥ al-Dajjāl) and establish justice.
Subsequently, this study evaluates alternative interpretations. These include views that the pronoun refers to the Qurʾān itself, arguing it provides knowledge of the Eschaton; to the Prophet Muhammad, based on traditions linking his advent to the Eschaton's proximity; or to the Shiʿa Imams, specifically Imam ʿAli or Mahdi, as found in certain Shiʿa narrative sources. Each of these opinions is critically assessed and found to be inconsistent with the immediate context (siyāq) of the verses in Surah al-Zukhruf, which centrally and continuously discuss the person and nature of Jesus Christ.
The core of the study presents a detailed critique of the dominant view. It identifies several methodological and contextual weaknesses according to Islamic theology. Firstly, it argues that the interpretation has been overly dictated by the narrative discourse surrounding Jesus's descent, often at the expense of a close textual analysis of the Qurʾānic passage itself. Secondly, it highlights an incompatibility with the verse's context; the surrounding verses (43:57-66) focus on affirming the true, human nature of Jesus as a servant of God and refuting claims of his divinity, not on outlining eschatological signs.
Introducing the concept of his future descent appears disruptive to this coherent thematic flow. Thirdly, the study questions the linguistic necessity of the dominant reading, pointing out that accepting it often requires imposing two implied words—descent (nuzūl) for Jesus and nearness (qurb) for the Eschaton—which violates the hermeneutical principle that avoids unnecessary assumptions in the text: ʿadam al-taqdīr awlā min al-taqdīr. Furthermore, it distinguishes between the Qurʾānic concepts of knowledge for the Eschaton (ʿilm li'l-sāʿa) found in this verse and the ‛portents of the Hour’ (ashrāṭ al-sāʿa) mentioned elsewhere (e.g., 47:18), arguing they are not synonymous. Finally, adherence to the dominant view frequently necessitates abandoning the canonical reading of ʿilm for the less common ʿalam, a shift seemingly motivated by exegetical preference rather than textual evidence.
In contrast, the study advocates for an interpretation, supported by exegetes like Muḥammad Ḥusayn al-Ṭabāṭabāʾī, contemporary Shiite commentator and author of al-Mīzān fī Tafsīr al-Qurʾān, that the pronoun refers directly to the person of Jesus. His miraculous life story—including his virgin birth, his miracles like reviving the dead, his ascension, and his general exceptional nature—serves as profound knowledge that substantiates the possibility and reality of the Hereafter. This reading coherently links to the verse's subsequent command, falā tamtarunna bihā (meaning “so do not doubt it”) as the extraordinary nature of Jesus's own existence provides a tangible basis for believing in the ultimate power of God to resurrect, thereby addressing the doubts of the initial Qurʾānic audience and readers throughout time.
This interpretation is found to be more consistent with the immediate context, linguistically sound without requiring textual emendation, and logically connected to the verse's exhortative conclusion. The study concludes that while traditions about Jesus's descent may hold their own validity within Islamic eschatology, they should not be conflated with the exegesis of this specific verse, whose primary intent is to present the person of Jesus himself as a compelling evidence for the Escahton.
Keywords

Subjects


  • The Holy Qurʾān, Original Arabic; Also, Persian translation by ʿAbd al-Muḥammad Āyatī, Tehran, Soroush, 1374 SAH [Persian].
  • The New Testament.
  • Abū Ḥayyān, Muḥammad b. Yūsuf, Al-Baḥr al-Muḥīṭ, Beirut, Dār al-Fikr, 1420 AH [Arabic].
  • Aḥmad b. Ḥanbal, Al-Musnad, ed. Shuʿayb al-Arnaʾūṭ et al., Beirut, Muʾassasat al-Risālah, 1421 AH [Arabic].
  • Aḥmad b. Ḥanbal, Al-Zuhd, Beirut, Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmīyah, 1420 AH [Arabic].
  • Al-Astarābādī, ʿAlī, Taʾwīl al-Āyāt al-Ẓāhirah, Qom, Jāmiʿah-ye Mudarrisīn, 1409 AH [Arabic].
  • Al-Azharī, Muḥammad b. Aḥmad, Tahdhīb al-Lughah, Beirut, Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī, 1421 AH [Arabic].
  • Al-Baḥrānī, al-Sayyid Hāshim, Al-Burhān fī Tafsīr al-Qurʾān, Qom, Muʾassasat-e Baʿthat, 1374 SAH [Arabic].
  • Al-Baḥrānī, al-Sayyid Hāshim, Ḥilyat al-Abrār, Qom, Muʾassasat al-Maʿārif al-Islāmīyah, 1411 AH [Arabic].
  • Al-Bayḍāwī, ʿAbd Allāh b. ʿUmar, Anwār al-Tanzīl, Beirut, Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī, 1418 AH [Arabic].
  • Al-Bukhārī, Muḥammad b. Ismāʿīl, Al-Ṣaḥīḥ, Cairo, al-Maṭbaʿah al-Sulṭānīyah, 1422 AH [Arabic].
  • Al-Dakhīl, ʿAlī b. Muḥammad ʿAlī, Al-Wajīz fī Tafsīr al-Kitāb al-ʿAzīz, Beirut, Dār al-Taʿāruf li-l-Maṭbūʿāt, 1422 AH [Arabic].
  • Al-Daylamī, Ḥasan b. Muḥammad, Ghurar al-Akhbār, Qom, Dalīl-e Mā, 1427 AH [Arabic].
  • Al-Dimyāṭī, Aḥmad b. Muḥammad, Ithāf Fuḍalāʾ al-Bashar, Beirut, Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmīyah, 2006 [Arabic].
  • Al-Fayḍ al-Kāshānī, Muḥammad Muḥsin b. Murtaḍā, Al-Ṣāfī fī Tafsīr al-Qurʾān, Qom, Kitābfurūshī-ye Ṣadr, 1415 AH [Arabic].
  • Al-Ḥijāzī, Muḥammad Maḥmūd, Al-Tafsīr al-Wāḍiḥ, Beirut, Dār al-Jīl al-Jadīd, 1413 AH [Arabic].
  • Al-Ḥusaynī al-Hamadānī, Muḥammad Ḥusayn, Anwār-i Darakhshān, Tehran, Kitābfurūshī-ye Luṭfī, 1404 AH [Persian].
  • Al-Irbilī, ʿAlī b. ʿĪsā, Kashf al-Ghummah, Tabriz, Bani-Hāshimī, 1381 AH [Arabic].
  • Al-Jaṣṣāṣ, Aḥmad b. ʿAlī, Aḥkām al-Qurʾān, Beirut, Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī, 1405 AH [Arabic].
  • Al-Khalīl b. Aḥmad, Al-ʿAyn, ed. Mahdī Makhzūmī and Ibrāhīm al-Sāmarrāʾī, Beirut, Dār wa Maktabat al-Hilāl, 1980 [Arabic].
  • Al-Khūʾī, Abū al-Qāsim, Al-Bayān fī Tafsīr al-Qurʾān, Qom, Muʾassasat Iḥyāʾ Āthār al-Imām al-Khūʾī [Arabic].
  • Al-Kulaynī, Muḥammad b. Yaʿqūb, Al-Kāfī, ed. ʿAlī Akbar al-Ghaffārī, Tehran, Islāmīyah, 1407 AH [Arabic].
  • Al-Murāghī, Aḥmad b. Muṣṭafā, Al-Tafsīr, Beirut, Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī [Arabic].
  • Al-Muṣṭafawī, al-Sayyid Ḥasan, Al-Taḥqīq fī Kalimāt al-Qurʾān al-Karīm, Beirut, Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmīyah, 1430 AH [Arabic].
  • Al-Muẓhirī, Muḥammad Thanāʾ Allāh, Al-Tafsīr, Pakistan, Maktabat Rashdīyah, 1412 AH [Arabic].
  • Al-Nuʿaym b. Ḥammād al-Marwazī, Al-Fitan, ed. Samīr Amīn Zuhayrī, Cairo, Maktabat al-Tawḥīd, 1412 AH [Arabic].
  • Al-Qāsimī, Muḥammad Jamāl al-Dīn, Maḥāsin al-Taʾwīl, Beirut, Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmīyah, 1418 AH [Arabic].
  • Al-Qummī, ʿAlī b. Ibrāhīm, Tafsīr al-Qummī, Qom, Dār al-Kitāb, 1404 AH [Arabic].
  • Al-Qurashī, al-Sayyid ʿAlī Akbar, Tafsīr Aḥsan al-Ḥadīth, Tehran, Bunyād-e Baʿthat, 1377 SAH [Persian].
  • Al-Qurṭubī, Abū ʿAbd Allāh, Al-Jāmiʿ li-Aḥkām al-Qurʾān, Cairo, Dār al-Kutub al-Miṣrīyah, 1384 AH [Arabic].
  • Al-Qushayrī, ʿAbd al-Karīm b. Hawāzin, Laṭāʾif al-Ishārāt, Cairo, al-Hayʾah al-Miṣrīyah al-ʿĀmmah li-l-Kitāb [Arabic].
  • Al-Rāghib al-Iṣfahānī, Ḥusayn b. Muḥammad, Mufradāt Alfāẓ al-Qurʾān, Beirut, Dār al-Qalam, 1412 AH [Arabic].
  • Al-Sabzawārī al-Najafī, Muḥammad b. Ḥabīb Allāh, Al-Jadīd fī Tafsīr al-Qurʾān al-ajīd, Beirut, 1406 AH [Arabic].
  • Al-Ṣāfī, Maḥmūd b. ʿAbd al-Raḥīm, Al-Jadwal fī Iʿrāb al-Qurʾān, Beirut, Dār al-Rashīd, 1418 AH [Arabic].
  • Al-Shawkānī, Muḥammad b. ʿAlī, Fatḥ al-Qadīr, Damascus, Dār Ibn Kathīr, 1414 AH [Arabic].
  • Al-Shubbar, al-Sayyid ʿAbd Allāh, Tafsīr al-Qurʾān al-Karīm, Beirut, Dār al-Balāghah, 1412 AH [Arabic].
  • Al-Ṣubḥānī, Jaʿfar, Al-Mūjiz fī Uṣūl al-Fiqh, Qom, Muʾassasat al-Imām al-Ṣādiq, 1420 AH [Arabic].
  • Al-Ṭabarānī, Sulaymān b. Aḥmad, Al-Muʿjam al-Awsaṭ, Cairo, Dār al-Ḥaramayn [Arabic].
  • Al-Ṭabarī, Muḥammad b. Jarīr, Jāmiʿ al-Bayān, Cairo, Dār Hajar, 1422 AH [Arabic].
  • Al-Ṭabarī, Muḥammad b. Jarīr, Tārīkh al-Umam wa al-Mulūk, ed. Muḥammad Abū al-Faḍl Ibrāhīm, Egypt, Dār al-Maʿārif, 1387 AH [Arabic].
  • Al-Ṭabrisī, Faḍl b. al-Ḥasan, Majmaʿ al-Bayān, Tehran, Nāṣir Khusraw, 1372 SAH [Arabic].
  • Al-Ṭayālisī, Sulaymān b. Dāwūd, Al-Musnad, Giza, Dār Hajar, 1419 AH [Arabic].
  • Al-Tirmidhī, Muḥammad b. ʿĪsā, Al-Sunan, ed. Aḥmad Muḥammad Shākir, Cairo, Maṭbaʿat al-Ḥalabī, 1395 AH [Arabic].
  • Al-Ṭūsī, Muḥammad b. al-Ḥasan, Al-Amālī, Qom, Dār al-Thaqāfah, 1414 AH [Arabic].
  • Al-Ṭūsī, Muḥammad b. al-Ḥasan, Al-Tibyān, ed. Aḥmad Ḥabīb Qaṣīr al-ʿĀmilī, Najaf, Maṭbaʿat al-Nuʿmān, 1383 AH / 1964 [Arabic].
  • Al-Zabīdī, Muḥammad b. Muḥammad, Tāj al-ʿArūs, Beirut, Dār al-Fikr, 1414 AH [Arabic].
  • Al-Zamakhsharī, Maḥmūd b. ʿUmar, Al-Kashshāf, Beirut, Dār al-Kutub al-ʿArabī, 1407 AH [Arabic].
  • Al-Zuḥaylī, Wahbah b. Muṣṭafā, Al-Tafsīr al-Munīr, Damascus, Dār al-Fikr, 1418 AH [Arabic].
  • Faḍl Allāh, al-Sayyid Muḥammad Ḥusayn, Min Waḥy al-Qurʾān, Beirut, Dār al-Malāk li-l-Ṭibāʿah wa al-Nashr, 1419 AH [Arabic].
  • Fakhr al-Rāzī, Muḥammad b. ʿUmar, Mafātīḥ al-Ghayb, Beirut, Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī, 1420 AH [Arabic].
  • Gunābādī, Sulṭān Muḥammad, Bayān al-Saʿādah, Beirut, Muʾassasat al-Aʿlamī, 1408 AH [Arabic].
  • Ibn Abī Shaybah, ʿAbd Allāh b. Muḥammad, Al-Muṣannaf, Beirut, Dār al-Tāj, 1409 AH [Arabic].
  • Ibn al-ʿArabī, Muḥyī al-Dīn Muḥammad b. ʿAlī, Al-Tafsīr, ed. ʿAbd al-Wārith Muḥammad ʿAlī, Beirut, Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmīyah, 1422 AH [Arabic].
  • Ibn al-Mubārak, ʿAbd Allāh, Al-Zuhd, ed. Ḥabīb al-Raḥmān al-Aʿẓamī, Beirut, Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmīyah, 1419 AH [Arabic].
  • Ibn ʿĀshūr, Muḥammad al-Ṭāhir, Al-Taḥrīr wa al-Tanwīr, Tunis, al-Dār al-Tūnisīyah li-l-Nashr, 1984 [Arabic].
  • Ibn Bābawayh, Muḥammad b. ʿAlī, Al-Khiṣāl, Qom, Jāmiʿah-ye Mudarrisīn, 1362 SAH [Arabic].
  • Ibn Bābawayh, Muḥammad b. ʿAlī, Kamāl al-Dīn, Tehran, Islāmīyah, 1395 AH [Arabic].
  • Ibn Fāris, Aḥmad, Muʿjam Maqāyīs al-Lughah, Qom, Sāzmān-e Tablīghāt-e Islāmī, 1404 AH [Arabic].
  • Ibn Kathīr, Ismāʿīl b. ʿUmar, Tafsīr al-Qurʾān al-ʿAẓīm, ed. Sāmī b. Muḥammad Salāmah, Riyadh, Dār Ṭayyibah li-l-Nashr wa al-Tawzīʿ, 1420 AH [Arabic].
  • Jabal, Muḥammad Ḥasan, Al-Muʿjam al-Ishtiqāqī al-Muʾaṣṣal li-Alfāẓ al-Qurʾān al-arīm, Cairo, Maktabat al-Ādāb, 2010 [Arabic].
  • Jābirī, Muḥammad ʿĀbid, Fahm al-Qurʾān al-Ḥakīm, tr. Muḥsin Ārmīn, Tehran, Nashr-e Ney, 1399 SAH [Persian].
  • Jeffery, Arthur, The Foreign Vocabulary of the Qurʾān, tr. Fereydūn Badreʾī, Tehran, Ṭūs, 1385 SAH [Persian].
  • Khalidi, Ṭarif, The Gospel in Muslim Perception, tr. Manṣūr Muʿtamadī, Tehran, Hermes, 1399 SAH [Persian].
  • Khusrawī, ʿAlī Riḍā, Tafsīr, Tehran, Islāmīyah, 1390 SAH [Persian].
  • Majtabāʾī, Fatḥ Allāh, “Ākhar al-Zamān”, Dāʾirat al-Maʿārif-i Buzurg-i Islāmī, ed. Kāẓim Mūsawī Bujnūrdī et al., vol. 1, Tehran, Markaz-e Pazhūhish-hā-ye Īrānī va Islāmī, 1367 SAH [Persian].
  • Malāḥawīsh Āl Ghāzī, ʿAbd al-Qādir, Bayān al-Maʿānī, Damascus, Maṭbaʿat al-Taraqqī, 1382 AH [Arabic].
  • Mashhadī al-Qummī, Muḥammad b. Muḥammad Riḍā, Kanz al-Daqāʾiq, Tehran, Vezārat-e Irshād-e Islāmī, 1368 SAH [Persian].
  • Mughnīyah, Muḥammad Jawād, Al-Tafsīr al-Kāshif, Tehran, Islāmīyah, 1424 AH [Arabic].
  • Mujāhid b. Jabr, Al-Tafsīr, Cairo, Dār al-Fikr al-Islāmī al-Ḥadīthah, 1410 AH [Arabic].
  • Muqātil b. Sulaymān, Al-Tafsīr, Beirut, Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth, 1423 AH [Arabic].
  • Mūsawī, Sayyid ʿAlī, and Ḥusaynī Mīrṣafī, Sayyideh Fāṭimah, “Taḥlīl-i Kārkird-i Nuzūl-i Ḥaḍrat-i ʿĪsā dar Dawlat-i Imām Mahdī az Manẓar-i Mufassirān-i Farīqayn”, Mashreq-e Mawʿūd, no. 58, 1400 SAH [Persian].
  • Mushkinī, ʿAlī, Iṣṭilāḥāt al-Uṣūl, Qom, Nashr al-Hādī, 1371 SAH [Persian].
  • Muslim b. al-Ḥajjāj, Al-Ṣaḥīḥ, ed. Muḥammad Fuʾād ʿAbd al-Bāqī, Beirut, Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī, 1374 AH [Arabic].
  • Najafī, Rūḥ Allāh, “A Study of the Ascension and Descent of Jesus in the Qurʾān Relying on the Christian Background”, The Mirror of Knowledge, vol. 22, no. 1, 2022, pp. 87-108 [Persian][1].
  • Quṭb, Sayyid, Fī Ẓilāl al-Qurʾān, Beirut, Dār al-Shurūq, 1412 AH [Arabic].
  • Rashīd Riḍā, Muḥammad, Tafsīr al-Manār, Egypt, al-Hayʾah al-Miṣrīyah al-ʿĀmmah li-l-Kitāb, 1990 [Arabic].
  • Shāh ʿAbd al-ʿAẓīmī, Ḥusayn b. Aḥmad, Tafsīr Ithnā ʿAsharī, Tehran, Mīqāt, 1363 SAH [Persian].
  • Shaltūt, Maḥmūd, Dirāsah li-Mushkilāt al-Muslim al-Muʿāṣir fī Ḥayātih al-Yawmīyah al-Āmmah, Cairo, Dār al-Shurūq, 1962 [Arabic].
  • Ṭanṭāwī, Muḥammad, Al-Tafsīr al-Wasīṭ, Cairo, Dār Nahḍat Miṣr, 1998 [Arabic].

Ṭayyib, ʿAbd al-Ḥusayn, Aṭyab al-Bayān fī Tafsīr al-Qurʾān, Tehran, Intishārāt-e Islām, 1378 SAH [Persian].

 

[1]. https://doi.org/10.52547/jipt.2022.224630.1187.

Volume 6, Issue 1 - Serial Number 11
September 2025
Pages 145-174

  • Receive Date 07 June 2025
  • Revise Date 27 August 2025
  • Accept Date 27 August 2025