Critical Studies on the Quranic Exegesis

Critical Studies on the Quranic Exegesis

Tracing the Sources of al-Tibyān’s Narrations: Comparative Study of Ḥadīth References

Document Type : Original article

Authors
اعظم فرجامی 1
Ronak Emami 2
Zohreh Narimani 3
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Theology, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.
2 Master’s degree in Quran and Hadith Sciences, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.
3 Assistant Professor, University of Quranic Sciences and Knowledge, Faculty of Quranic Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
10.22034/naghdeara.2025.503330.1267
Abstract
Comparative exegesis serves as a critical methodological tool for elucidating the meanings of Quranic verses by systematically analyzing the interpretations of both Shi’a and Sunni commentators. Beyond its primary function of clarifying scriptural texts, this approach offers significant ancillary benefits, including the identification of literary sources underpinning major exegetical works. Al-Tibyān fī Tafsīr al-Qurʾān by Sheikh Abū Jaʿfar al-Ṭūsī (d. 460/1067) represents one such work where source-critical analysis remains underexplored—particularly concerning its narration (riwāya) corpus attributed to the Ahl al-Bayt (a.s.). Recovering these primary sources from al-Tibyān’s extensive narrative material would not only enhance our understanding of early ḥadīth transmission but also potentially reconstruct lost layers of Shi’a-Sunni theological discourse. The tracing of textual provenance can chronologically anchor interpretive ideas, sometimes advancing their documented history by centuries while simultaneously providing criteria for authenticity assessment.
This study addresses three core questions: (1) Through a systematic comparison of exegetical and ḥadīth sources predating the 5th/11th century, what are the definitive or probable origins of the Imamic narrations cited in al-Tibyān? (2) Which Shi’a and Sunni works exerted the most substantial influence on al-Ṭūsī’s transmission of these traditions? (3) What methodological features characterize al-Ṭūsī’s approach to handling interpretive narrations?
The research employs a multi-stage comparative analysis: First, all Imamic narrations within al-Tibyān’s exegetical sections are extracted and cataloged. These are then cross-referenced against a digitally compiled corpus of pre-5th century Shi’a (e.g., al-Kāfī, Tafsīr al-Qummī) and Sunni sources (e.g., Jāmiʿ al-Bayān of al-Ṭabarī, Maʿānī al-Qurʾān of al-Farrāʾ) using specialized text-analysis software (Noor Digital Library, Jawāmiʿ al-Kalim). Given that medieval scholars rarely cited sources explicitly, attribution relies on probabilistic criteria: lexical parallels, unique thematic combinations, and transmission chains (isnāds) where preserved. The study acknowledges the limitations of this approach—shared narrations may derive from unpreserved intermediary texts rather than direct borrowing.
Key findings reveal that al-Ṭūsī’s narrative sources are predominantly Sunni exegetical works, with al-Ṭabarī’s Jāmiʿ al-Bayān alone accounting for part of identifiable citations. This positions al-Tibyān as one of the earliest Shi’a commentaries to systematically integrate Sunni ḥadīth material. Among Shi’a sources, the now-lost Tafsīr Abī al-Jārūd and al-Maghribī’s al-Maṣābīḥ are recurrently referenced, albeit through indirect transmission. Three methodological tendencies emerge: (i) deliberate omission of isnāds (likely to streamline theological arguments), (ii) paraphrasing of original narrations (with occasional doctrinal adjustments), and (iii) textual corruptions—some attributable to scribal errors, others to al-Ṭūsī’s reliance on memorized material.
Notably, some of attributions to Sunni authorities (e.g., al-Zajjāj, Abū ʿAlī al-Jubbāʾī) contain inaccuracies—either misattributions or conflated citations. For instance, several narrations ascribed to al-Ṭabarī regarding the Ahl al-Bayt are absent from extant editions of his Tafsīr. While manuscript losses cannot be discounted, internal evidence suggests mnemonic reconstruction by al-Ṭūsī or later redactors. A marginal but significant subset shows clear signs of post-compilation interpolation, possibly by students or scribes seeking to "enhance" the text’s doctrinal coherence.
The study’s implications extend beyond al-Tibyān: (1) It provides a model for reconstructing lost tafsīr works (e.g., Muʿtazilite commentaries known only through refutations); (2) Demonstrates how 5th/11th-century Shi’a scholars engaged with Sunni ḥadīth corpora prior to the canonization of the "Four Books"; (3) Highlights the necessity of software-assisted ḥadīth archaeology to disentangle complex textual genealogies. Future research should expand this methodology to other classical commentaries like Majmaʿ al-Bayān to map the evolution of Shi’a exegetical sourcing.
Keywords
Al-Shaykh al-Ṭūsī
Al-Tibyān fī Tafsīr al-Qurʾān
Quranic exegesis traditions
Comparative Source Study
Source Reconstruction

Subjects

  • The Holy Qurʾān, Original Arabic; Also, Persian translation by Muḥammad Mahdī Fulādvand, Tehran, Daftar-e Muṭāliʿāt-e Tārīkh va Maʿārif-e Islāmī, 1376 SH [Persian].
  • Abū Ṭālib al-Hārūnī, Yaḥyā ibn al-Ḥusayn, Taysīr al-Maṭālib fī Amālī Abī Ṭālib, Edited by ʿAbd Allāh ibn Ḥammūd al-ʿIzzī, Muʾassasat al-Imām Zayd ibn ʿAlī (ʿa) al-Thaqāfīyah [Arabic].
  • Abū ʿUbayd, al-Qāsim ibn Sallām, Gharīb al-Ḥadīth, Edited by Muḥammad ʿAbd al-Muʿīd Khān, Beirut, Dār al-Kitāb al-ʿArabī, 1396 SH [Arabic].
  • Aḥmad ibn Ḥanbal, Musnad al-Imām Aḥmad ibn Ḥanbal, Edited by Shuʿayb al-Arnāʾūṭ et al., Beirut, Muʾassasat al-Risālah, 1420 AH [Arabic].
  • al-Balādhurī, Aḥmad ibn Yaḥyā, Ansāb al-Ashrāf, Edited by Muḥammad Bāqir al-Maḥmūdī, Beirut, Muʾassasat al-Aʿlamī li-l-Maṭbūʿāt, 1974 [Arabic].
  • al-Barqī, Aḥmad ibn Khālid, al-Rijāl, Tehran, Intishārāt-i Dānishgāh-i Tehran, 1383 SH [Persian].
  • al-Farrāʾ, Yaḥyā ibn Ziyād, Maʿānī al-Qurʾān, Edited by Muḥammad ʿAlī al-Najjār and Aḥmad Yūsuf al-Najātī, Cairo, al-Hayʾah al-Miṣrīyah al-ʿĀmmah li-l-Kitāb, 1980 [Arabic].
  • al-Jāḥiẓ, ʿAmr ibn Baḥr, al-Bayān wa al-Tabyīn, Beirut, Dār wa Maktabat al-Hilāl, 1423 AH [Arabic].
  • al-Jaṣṣāṣ, Aḥmad ibn ʿAlī, Aḥkām al-Qurʾān, Edited by ʿAbd al-Salām Muḥammad ʿAlī Shāhīn, Beirut, Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmīyah, 1415 AH [Arabic].
  • al-Kashshī, Muḥammad ibn ʿUmar, Maʿrifat al-Rijāl, Ikhtiyār al-Shaykh al-Ṭūsī, Mashhad, Dānishgāh-i Mashhad, 1348 AH [Arabic].
  • al-Kharāʾiṭī, Muḥammad ibn Jaʿfar, Faḍīlat al-Shukr li-Allāh ʿalā Niʿmatih, Edited by Muḥammad Muṭīʿ al-Ḥāfiẓ and ʿAbd al-Karīm Yāfī, Damascus, Dār al-Fikr, 1402 AH [Arabic].
  • al-Mufīd, Muḥammad ibn Nuʿmān, al-Amālī, Qom, Intishārāt-i Kungrih-yi Jahānī-yi Shaykh al-Mufīd, 1413 AH [Arabic].
  • al-Najāshī, Aḥmad ibn ʿAlī, al-Rijāl, Edited by Mūsā al-Shubayrī al-Zanjānī, Qom, 1407 AH [Arabic].
  • al-Qāḍī ʿAbd al-Jabbār, ʿAbd al-Jabbār ibn Aḥmad, Thabāt Dalāʾil al-Nubuwwah, Cairo, Dār al-Muṣṭafā [Arabic].
  • al-Qāḍī al-Nuʿmān, Nuʿmān ibn Muḥammad, Daʿāʾim al-Islām, Cairo, Dār al-Maʿārif, 1385 SH [Arabic].
  • al-Qāḍī al-Quḍāʿī, Muḥammad ibn Salāmah, Musnad al-Shihāb, Edited by Hamdī ibn ʿAbd al-Majīd al-Salafī, Beirut, Muʾassasat al-Risālah, 1407 AH [Arabic].
  • al-Qummī, ʿAlī ibn Ibrāhīm, Tafsīr al-Qummī, Edited by Ṭayyib Mūsawī Jazāʾirī, Qom, Dār al-Kitāb, 1363 SH [Persian].
  • al-Ṣadūq, Muḥammad ibn ʿAlī, Man lā Yaḥḍuruh al-Faqīh, Qom, Intishārāt-i Jāmiʿah-yi Mudarrisīn, 1413 AH [Arabic].
  • al-Samʿānī, Manṣūr ibn Muḥammad, Tafsīr al-Qurʾān, Edited by Yāsir ibn Ibrāhīm and Ghanīm ibn ʿAbbās ibn Ghanīm, Riyadh, Dār al-Waṭan, 1418 AH [Arabic].
  • al-Ṣanʿānī, ʿAbd al-Razzāq ibn Hammām, al-Muṣannaf, Edited by Ḥabīb al-Raḥmān al-Aʿẓamī, Beirut, al-Majlis al-ʿIlmī, 1403 AH [Arabic].
  • al-Sharīf al-Murtaḍā, ʿAlī ibn al-Ḥusayn, al-Amālī, Edited by Muḥammad Badr al-Dīn al-Naʿsānī al-Ḥalabī, Qom, Maktabat Āyat Allāh al-Marʿashī, 1325 AH [Arabic].
  • al-Sharīf al-Murtaḍā, ʿAlī ibn al-Ḥusayn, al-Shāfī fī al-Imāmah, Qom, Muʾassasat Ismāʿīlīyān, 1410 AH [Arabic].
  • al-Sharīf al-Murtaḍā, ʿAlī ibn al-Ḥusayn, Tanzīh al-Anbiyāʾ, Qom, al-Sharīf al-Raḍī [Arabic].
  • al-Ṭabarānī, Sulaymān ibn Aḥmad, al-Muʿjam al-Awsaṭ, Edited by Ṭāriq ibn ʿAwḍ Allāh ibn Muḥammad and ʿAbd al-Muḥsin ibn Ibrāhīm al-Ḥusaynī, Cairo, Dār al-Ḥaramayn, 1415 AH [Arabic].
  • al-Ṭabarānī, Sulaymān ibn Aḥmad, al-Muʿjam al-Ṣaghīr, Edited by Muḥammad Shukūr Amīr, Beirut, al-Maktab al-Islāmī, 1405 AH [Arabic].
  • al-Ṭabarī, Muḥammad ibn Jarīr, Jāmiʿ al-Bayān, Beirut, Dār al-Maʿrifah, 1412 AH [Arabic].
  • al-Ṭabarsī, Faḍl ibn al-Ḥasan, Majmaʿ al-Bayān, Edited by Faḍl Allāh Yazdī Ṭabāṭabāʾī and Hāshim Rasūlī, Tehran, Nāṣir Khusraw, 1372 SH [Persian].
  • al-Ṭaʿlabī, Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad, al-Kashf wa al-Bayān, Edited by Abū Muḥammad ibn ʿĀshūr, Beirut, Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī, 1422 AH [Arabic].
  • al-Ṭūsī, Muḥammad ibn al-Ḥasan, al-Amālī, Qom, Intishārāt-i Dār al-Thaqāfah, 1414 AH [Arabic].
  • al-Ṭūsī, Muḥammad ibn al-Ḥasan, al-Rijāl, Qom, Jāmiʿah-yi Mudarrisīn, 1415 AH [Arabic].
  • al-Ṭūsī, Muḥammad ibn al-Ḥasan, al-Tibyān, Edited by Aḥmad Ḥabīb Qaṣīr ʿĀmilī, Beirut, Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī [Arabic].
  • al-Ṭūsī, Muḥammad ibn al-Ḥasan, Tahdhīb al-Aḥkām, Tehran, Islāmīyah, 1365 SH [Persian].
  • al-Zahrānī, ʿAbd al-Karīm ibn Ṣāliḥ, al-Maṣābīḥ fī Tafsīr al-Qurʾān al-ʿAẓīm li-l-Ḥusayn ibn ʿAlī al-Maʿrūf bi-l-Wazīr al-Maghribī min Awwal Sūrat al-Fātiḥah ilā Ākhir Sūrat al-Isrāʾ, PhD Dissertation, Umm al-Qurā University, 1421 AH [Arabic].
  • al-Zajjāj, Ibrāhīm ibn Sarī, Maʿānī al-Qurʾān wa Iʿrābuh, Edited by ʿAbd al-Jalīl ʿAbduh Shalbī, Beirut, ʿĀlam al-Kutub, 1408 AH [Arabic].
  • al-Zamakhsharī, Maḥmūd ibn ʿUmar, al-Kashshāf, Beirut, Dār al-Kitāb al-ʿArabī, 1407 AH [Arabic].
  • Farjāmī, Aʿẓam, Emāmī, Rūnāk, and Narīmānī, Zahrah, ”Maṣdaryābī-yi Taṭbīqī-yi Riwāyāt al-Tibyān Ṭūsī dar Tafāsīr al-Maṣābīḥ Wazīr Maghribī wa Jāmiʿ al-Bayān Ṭabarī,” Kitāb-i Qayyim, No. 24, Spring and Summer 1400 SH [Persian].
  • Ibn Abī Shaybah, ʿAbd Allāh, al-Muṣannaf, Edited by Saʿīd al-Laḥḥām, Beirut, Dār al-Fikr li-l-Ṭibāʿah wa al-Nashr wa al-Tawzīʿ, 1409 AH [Arabic].
  • Ibn al-Khalawayh, al-Ḥusayn ibn Aḥmad, Iʿrāb al-Qirāʾāt al-Sabʿ wa ʿIlalihā, Cairo, Maktabat al-Khānjī, 1413 AH [Arabic].
  • Ibn Ḥajar al-ʿAsqalānī, Aḥmad ibn ʿAlī, Tahdhīb al-Tahdhīb, Beirut, Dār al-Fikr, 1404 AH [Arabic].
  • Ibn Mājah, Muḥammad ibn Yazīd, Sunan Ibn Mājah, Edited by Muḥammad Fuʾād ʿAbd al-Bāqī, Dār al-Fikr li-l-Ṭibāʿah wa al-Nashr wa al-Tawzīʿ [Arabic].
  • Ibn Saʿd, Muḥammad ibn Saʿd, al-Ṭabaqāt, Edited by Muḥammad ʿAbd al-Qādir ʿAṭā, Beirut, Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmīyah, 1410 AH [Arabic].
  • Karīmī Niyā, Murtad̤ā, ”Maʾkalah-yi Sālah-yi Yahūd: Barrisī-yi Riwāyatī Tafsīrī dar Manābīʿ-i Qadīm-i Shīʿah wa Sunnī,” Pazhūhish-hā-yi Qurʾān wa Ḥadīth, Year 44, No. 2, Fall and Winter 1390 SH [Persian].
  • Karīmī Niyā, Murtad̤ā, ”Shaykh Ṭūsī wa Manābīʿ-i Tafsīrī-yi Ū dar al-Tibyān,” Muṭāliʿāt-i Islāmī, No. 74, Winter 1385 SH [Persian].
  • Karīmī Niyā, Murtad̤ā, Wazīr Maghribī wa Ravesh Shināsī-yi al-Maṣābīḥ fī Tafsīr al-Qurʾān, PhD Dissertation, University of Tehran, Faculty of Theology and Islamic Studies, 1394 SH [Persian].
  • Muqātil ibn Sulaymān, al-Tafsīr, Edited by ʿAbd Allāh Maḥmūd Shiḥātah, Beirut, Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī, 1423 AH [Arabic].
  • Muslim ibn al-Ḥajjāj, al-Ṣaḥīḥ, Beirut, Dār al-Fikr [Arabic].
  • Nahj al-Balāghah, Collected by al-Sharīf al-Raḍī, Beirut, 1387 SH [Arabic].
  • Rahbarī, Ḥasan, ”Riwāyat dar Tafsīr-i Tibyān,” Pazhūhish-hā-yi Qurʾānī, Vol. 14, No. 56, March 1387 SH [Persian].
  • Zayd ibn ʿAlī, al-Musnad, Beirut, Manshūrāt Dār Maktabat al-Ḥayāh [Arabic].

  • Receive Date 09 February 2025
  • Revise Date 14 March 2025
  • Accept Date 14 March 2025