Critical Studies on the Quranic Exegesis

Critical Studies on the Quranic Exegesis

A Critical Study of Orientalists' Reflections on Two Alleged Images of Abraham in Qurʾan and the Identity of His Sacrificed Son

Document Type : Original article

Author
Associate Professor in Islamic Theology, Payam-e Noor University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
It is necessary to study the works of scholars and critique their views on the Qurʾan and Islamic teachings. Considering the importance of Prophet Abraham as the founder of monotheistic religions, and his son Ismaʿīl as the sacrifice of his father, orientalists have studied the lives of these prophets in their studies. Although some Orientalists have done research on Islam and the Qurʾan, they have made some mistakes due to inconsistencies in the verses. For example, the difference between the attributes of Prophet Abraham in the verses, the emphasis on the non-prominence of him in some verses, confirming the expression of the milla of Abraham, and identity of the sacrificed son. In addition to the Orientalists' motivation for claiming differences in the verses, it seems that one of the factors created the illusion of difference is the lack of access to reliable sources. The present study has studied the works of Orientalists on the subject with an analytical-critical approach. This study aimed to examine the works of Orientalists on the subject with an analytical-critical approach. An attempt will be made to defend the hypothesis that orientalists, due to the bias they have unintentionally shown on their cultural perceptions of the meanings of the verses, and also due to incomplete access to reliable sources, when they observe any kind of difference between one verse and another, they consider it as a distortion and contradiction; While two verses can be considered contradictory just when the truth of one verse results in another falsehood.
Keywords

  • The Holy Qurān, Arabic Text, also: Persain translation by Mahdī Elāhī Qomshe-ʾī, Tehran, ʿElmī Publication, 1325 SAH.
  • ʿAbdollāhī, Ḥoseyn, The Dictionary of Foreign Orientalists, Isfahan, Moṭahhar publication, 1362 SAH.
  • Āqā Ḥoseynī, Ḥoseyn and Zerāʿatī, Samāne,“The Abraham Story in Comparison to the Mystical and Hermeneutic Persian Texts up to the Tenth Century AH”, Comparative Studies, Comparative Theology, 2nd No., Tir 1389 SAH.
  • Bell, Richard, AnIntroduction to the History of the Qurʾān, Persian translation by Bahāʾuddīn Khorramshāhī, Qom, Qurān Translation Centre, 1382 SAH.
  • BeykMuḥammadī, Khalīlullāh, “The Comparative Study of the Historical Event: Sacrifice of Hazrat Ismail in Religious Texts with Archaeological Findings from Babylon”, Parseh Journal of Archaeological Studies, vol. II, No. 4, summer 1397 SAH.
  • Bīgdelī, ʿĀṭefe, Abraham Geiger's Research on the Relationship between the Qurʾān and Jewish Sources, Master's Thesis of Quran and Hadith Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch of Tehran, 2013.
  • Elāhī, ʿAbbās and Sāzandegī, Mahdī, “Critique of Firestone’s Article Abraham”, Qurān from Orientalists Point of View, vol. 15, No. 28, 1399 SAH.
  • Fakhr al-Dīn Rāzī, Muḥammad b. ʿUmar, Al-Tafsīr al-Kabīr, Beirut, Dār Iḥyāʾ al‑Turāth al-ʿArabī, 1420 AH.
  • Firestone, Reuven, “Abraham”, Encyclopaedia of the Quran, vol. 1, Leiden, Brill, 2001.
  • Geiger, Abraham, Judaism and Islam, Berlin, M.D.C.S.P.C.K, 1898.
  • Geiger, Abraham, Was hat Mohammad aus dem Judentbume Aufgenommen, Bonn, F. Baaden, 1833.
  • Ḥeydarī, ʿAlīReḍā, “Studying the Orientalists oncerning Contradiction in Quran Verses”, Quranic Knowledge Research, vol. VI, no. 20, spring 1394 SAH.
  • Hurgronje, Christian Snouck, Het Mekkaansche feest, E.J. Brill, Leiden 1880.
  • Ibn Shahr Āshūb, Muḥammad b. ‘Āli, Mushābih al-Qurān, Tehran, Ṭabʿ Ketāb Joint Stock Company, 1410 AH.
  • Khālīl b. Aḥmad, Al-ʿAyn, ed. Mahdī Makhzūmī and Ibrāhīm Sāmirrāʾī, Beirut, Dār wa Maktaba al-Hilāl, 1980.
  • Khazāʿelī, Moḥammad, Aʿlām-e Qurān, Tehrān, Amīrkabīr, 1389 SAH.
  • Maleklū, Ṣeddīqe et al, “Critical Analysis of the Viewpoint of Some Orientalists on the Difference between the Figure of Abraham and Ishmael in Meccan and Medinan Chapters” Quranic studies and Islamic culture, vol. II, no. 1, April 2017.
  • Muṣṭafawī, Ḥasan, Al-Taḥqīq fī Kalimāt al-Qurān al-Karīm, Tehrān, Translation and Punlication of Book Foundation, 1360 SAH.
  • Noldeke, Theodor, The History of the Qurʾān, tr. Wolfgang H. Behn, Leiden, Brill, 2013.
  • Paret, Rudy, “Ibrāhīm”, Encyclopedia of Islam, vol. III, Leiden, Brill, 1986.
  • Rāqib Isfaḥānī, Ḥusayn b. Muḥammad, Al-Mufradāt, Beirūt, Dār al-ʿIlm, 1412 AH.
  • Saḥāb, Abulqāsem, Dictionary of Orientalism, Tehrān, Sahāb, 1356 SAH.
  • Sprenger, Aloys, The Life of Mohammad, AllahAbad, Persbyterian Mission Press, 1851.
  • Ṭabāṭabāyī, Muḥammad Ḥusayn, Al-Mīzān, , Qom, Djamā’a al-Mudarrisīn, 1417 AH.
  • The Old Testament, Persian translation, Tehrān, Iranian Bible Association, 1380 SAH.
  • Wellhausen, Julius, Reste Arabischen Heidentumes, vol. 3, Berlin, Georg Reimer, 1887.

Wensinck, A. J., Mohummed en de Joden in Medinu, Leiden, E. J. Brill, 1908.

Volume 3, Issue 1 - Serial Number 5
September 2022
Pages 11-31

  • Receive Date 15 November 2021
  • Revise Date 16 June 2022
  • Accept Date 04 July 2022