1
Assistant professor in Quranic Exegesis, University of Quranic Theology and Awareness, Mashhad, Iran.
2
Assistant professor in Qurʾān and Ḥadith Studies, Zanjān Branch, Islamic Azad University, Zanjān, Iran.
Abstract
Based on some traditions, the Prophet Muḥammad called the Suras Al-Nas and Al-Falaq “Al-Muʿawwadhatayn”. This indicates the common themes and synergies of these two suras. In this study, with an effort to understand the thematic axis of these suras, the popular meaning of some vocabulary of these two suras is criticized. Evil is one of the common words of these two suras, which is usually thought of as the opposite of good, and is meant as evil; While according to the main semantic component of this root (spreading) it means the existential evil of every creature. Contrary to the popular commentary of the word, the meaning of al-falaq is not the dawn. Dawn is one of its examples; not the litrally meaning. Considering the other words used from the same root in the Qurʾān, we can say that al-falaq includes any kind of splitting and blossoming from which a phenomenon occurs. Since all the creatures of the world are created by some kind of splitting, al-falaq includes all of existence. In this study, based on the same approach, we will have reflections and critiques about the popular meaning of the words Khanasa, al-ghāsiq, waqab and al-naffāthāt.
The Holy Qurʾān, arabic text, and also the persian translation by ʿAbdul‑Muḥammad Āyatī, Tehrān, Sorūsh, 1372 SAH.
ʿAbdollāhZāde, Ḥamze et al, “Barrasī Tatbīqī Taʾthīr Seḥr bar Payāmbar dar Ṣaḥīḥ Bokhārī va Moslem”, Pazhūheshhā-ye Tafsīr-e Tatbīqī, vol. 11, summer 1399 SAH.
ʿAbdul-Tawwāb, Ramaḍān, Mabāḥethī dar Feqh al-Lugha wa ZabānShenāsī‑ye ʿArabī, persian translation by ḤamīdReḍā Sheykhī, Mashhad, Āstān Qods Raḍawī, 1367 SAH.
Ibn Hāʾim, Aḥmad b. Muḥammad, Al-Tibyān, ed. Ḍāḥī ʿAbdul-Bāqī Muḥammad, Beirut, Dār al-Gharb al-Islāmī, 1423 AH.
Ibn Qayyim al-Jawzīyya, Tafsīr al-Qurʾān al-Karīm, ed. Maktab al-Dirāsāt wa al-Buḥūth al-ʿArabīyya wa al-Islāmīyya, Beirut, Dār wa Maktabat al-Hilāl, 1410 AH.
Ibn Qutayba, ʿAbdullāh b. Muslim, Gharīb al-Qurʾān, ed. Aḥmad Ṣaqr, Beirut, Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmīyya, 1398 AH.
Ibn Rāhawayh, Isḥāq, Al-Musnad, ed. ʿAbdulQafūr b. ʿAbdulḤaq Balūshī, Medina, Maktabat al-Īmān, 1412 AH.
Ibn Wahb, ʿAbdullāh, Al-Jāmiʿ, ed. Muṣṭafā Ḥasan, Riyadh, Dār Ibn al-Jawzī, 1416 AH.
Māwardī, ʿAlī b. Muḥammad, Al-Nukat wa al-ʿUyūn, ed. al-Sayyid b. ʿAbd al‑Maqṣūd, Beirut, Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmīyya.
Moḥammadī, Rūḥullāh and AkbarNezhād, Mahdī, “An inspection of the phenomena of evil eye in the Kuran and traditions”, Researches of Qurʾān and Ḥadīth Sciences, No. 12, year 6, issue 2, winter 2009.
Rajabī Qodsī, Muḥsen, “Dividing the Qurʾān into Seven Portions”, Mishkāt, vol. 34, issue 1, May 2015.
Ṣadr, Mūsā, Ḥadīth Saḥargāhān, persian transltion by ʿAlīReḍā Maḥmūdī and Mahdī Mūsavī Nezhād, Tehrān, Cultural Research Foundation of Imam Mūsā Ṣadr, 1397 SAH.
Sallūm, Muḥammad Dāwūd, Akkadian Dictionary, Persian translation by Nāder Karīmīyān Sardashtī, Tehrān, Pazhūheshkade-ye Zabān wa Gūyesh, 1384 SAH.
Rajabī Qodsī,M. and Morādī Zanjānī,Ḥ. (2021). The Words of Al-Muʿawwaḍatayn: Critique of Qurʾān Commentaries Based on the Structure of This Two Sūras. Critical Studies on the Quranic Exegesis, 2(1), 141-170.
MLA
Rajabī Qodsī,M. , and Morādī Zanjānī,Ḥ. . "The Words of Al-Muʿawwaḍatayn: Critique of Qurʾān Commentaries Based on the Structure of This Two Sūras", Critical Studies on the Quranic Exegesis, 2, 1, 2021, 141-170.
HARVARD
Rajabī Qodsī M., Morādī Zanjānī Ḥ. (2021). 'The Words of Al-Muʿawwaḍatayn: Critique of Qurʾān Commentaries Based on the Structure of This Two Sūras', Critical Studies on the Quranic Exegesis, 2(1), pp. 141-170.
CHICAGO
M. Rajabī Qodsī and Ḥ. Morādī Zanjānī, "The Words of Al-Muʿawwaḍatayn: Critique of Qurʾān Commentaries Based on the Structure of This Two Sūras," Critical Studies on the Quranic Exegesis, 2 1 (2021): 141-170,
VANCOUVER
Rajabī Qodsī M., Morādī Zanjānī Ḥ. The Words of Al-Muʿawwaḍatayn: Critique of Qurʾān Commentaries Based on the Structure of This Two Sūras. Critical Studies on the Quranic Exegesis, 2021; 2(1): 141-170.